Archive
HIT, Small Physician Practices, and IPAs
In its June 2011 Research Brief, the National Institute for Health Care Reform reports that “lessons from independent practice associations (IPAs) — net-works of small medical practices — can offer guidance about overcoming barriers to HIT adoption and use” in small physician practices. The study found that IPAs, as local networks of independent physician practices, promoted the development of HIT-knowledgeable physician leaders who were able to gain the trust of their less HIT experienced colleagues in coordinating efforts to deal with risk-based managed care contracts.
The study concludes that “IPA experiences with HIT adoption can offer insights for other entities charged with helping physicians in small practices overcome barriers to HIT adoption and use.”
(The study may also provide critical insights to, and hope in, dealing effectively with the even greater hurdles that physician groups are facing in their coming together to form accountable care organizations, where HIT will be critical to success.)
Compliance Oversight for Healthcare Leaders and Compliance Plans
In a new seven minute video presentation, OIG Inspector General Daniel Levinson and Chief Counsel Lewis Morris discuss the role of compliance and its importance to the health care industry.
By now, I think we all know that compliance with healthcare laws and regulations is good, and that noncompliance can be very bad. There is nothing much to learn in seven minutes. However, there is an important reminder in the video that the OIG wants providers to have effective compliance plans in place.
Nursing homes are required by the healthcare reform law to have such plans, and the law gives the OIG the power to require other healthcare industry groups to have compliance plans.
It is only a matter of time before this requirement is imposed on physicians. The OIG published guidance for physician compliance plans over 10 years ago. That guidance is worth reading again. Similar compliance guidance can be found at the OIG website for other kinds of healthcare providers.
This is something that healthcare providers should not put off any longer.
CMS Issues Stark Advisory Opinion 2011-01
In CMS Advisory Opinion AO-2011-01, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services issued an advisory opinion permitting a group to include a covenant not to compete in its employment agreement with a physician whose recruitment to the group was funded by a local hospital.
In its advisory opinion, CMS stated that the the physician recruitment exception to the Stark law “requires that the physician practice not impose additional practice restrictions on the recruited physician other than the conditions related to quality of care.” However, CMS acknowledged that, in its commentary to the Phase III Stark rulemaking, it had concluded “that non-competition provisions should not be categorically prohibited from recruitment arrangements.”
In determining that this particular noncompetition covenant did not impose practice restrictions that “unreasonably restrict the [p]hysician’s ability to practice medicine in the geographic area served by the [h]ospital,” CMS looked at the following factors:
- The time period restriction of one year was reasonable.
- The distance requirement of 25 miles was reasonable based on the geographic area served by the hospital.
- Even with the time period and distance restrictions, the physician would still be permitted to practice at certain hospitals both within and outside of the recruiting hospital’s geographic service area within the one year time period.
- The hospital had certified that the noncompetition covenat complied with applicable state and local laws.
As with all such advisory opinions, it is issued only to the requesting party and cannot be relied upon by any other individual or entity.
Nevertheless, this advisory opinion provides guidance for the first time on how CMS will analyze the language of the statute, the regualtions, and its own commentary in specific physician recruitment fact situations.
Better Care and the Bottom Line
According to a survey of health leaders published in a HealthLeaders Media Intelligence Report, “Better Care and the Bottom Line” (June 2011), best practices for chronic care and evidence-based medicine are needed to overcome drivers of waste such as overutilized services and a lack of integration.
- 52% of the survey respondents put overutilization of services in their top 3 drivers of waste in the healthcare system
- 67% say a realistic goal for readmission rates is 1% to 3%, but only 40% have achieved that goal
- The top three tools cited to address medical cost escalation are chronic care management, evidence-based medicine, and medical liability reform.
Healthcare providers are being presented with numerous avenues for achieving better quality and more cost effective medical care — ACOs, consolidation of practices, and affiliation with hospitals, to name just a few.
If you would like to get a copy of the Report, click here.
Whistleblowers Have Rights, Too
I just picked up this story from Outpatient Surgery.
Apparently, a sheriff in Winkler County, Texas decided to punish two nurses who complained about his physician friend. The nurses had filed an anonymous complaint about a variety of questionable practices by the physician. When the shreiff discovered who had filed the complaint, he charged the nurses with “misuse of medical information.”
The sheriff now faces jail time and a $6,000 fine.
ACOs — Savior of Physician-Based Healthcare?
I met with a large group of unaffiliated physicians last night who were worried about how to survive in this era of tightened budgets and schizophrenic healthcare reform. They had decided to form a large multi-specialty group, and be their own ACO, in the hope of controlling their care of their patients.
It is necessary for physicians to come together to form new delivery systems for patient care. It is exciting. It is also scary. Healthcare is not for sissies.
Read this article and download this special report about ACOs from HealthLeaders Media.
Physicians have an opportunity that will not last long to retake the healthcare delivery system for their benefit and for the benefit of their patients.
We all know that patients want physicians who care about them and will take care of them. Economics are important, but no one wants his or her healthcare to be so managed and so strained through insurance company and regulatory filters that it looks like the only thing that matters are the economics.
The heartbreak for so many physicians is that they cannot do what they went to med school to do — take care of people. Physicians have been forced to deliver the minimum amount of care, in the shortest time, to the maximum number of patients. The comfort of a trusted physician is what patients want.
ACOs may provide the mechanism by which physicians can reclaim the practice of medicine as a calling. Or, they can let the actuaries, accountants, and lawyers make the important decisions about healthcare.
Being proactive, being smart, and being cautious are critical to suviving as an independent healthcare provider.
Buckle Up: Proposed CMS ACO Regs, OIG Notice of Waiver, and FTC/DOJ Announcement
A lot happened this morning in the area of ACOs.
Whether any of the hundreds of pages of paper will be sufficient guidance to meaningfully assist healthcare providers and their advisors on how to proceed, only time will tell.
- CMS published its proposed regulations implementing Section 3022 of the Health Care Reform Act relating to payments to providers and suppliers participating in Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs).
- The OIG published its notice relating to the application (and waiver) of certain fraud and abuse laws in connection with ACOs.
- The FTC and DOJ published their proposed statement of antitrust enforcement policy relating to ACOs.
These are only proposed at this stage, and there is time to comment on the practicalities and difficulties of the proposals.
I suspect that we are going to see things start moving fast. There will be fear of being left behind.
So, it is time for physicians (if they haven’t already — which they should have been) to get educated about ACOs and what they mean to their practice of medicine. ACOs can provide a method for physician practices to remain independent. ACOs can also promote the consolidation of physician practices into larger single-specialty and multi-specialty groups. ACOs can also lead to the employment of physicians by hospitals and other large integrated healthcare delivery systems.
Standing still is an option for only the very short term.
Akerman Senterfitt’s brief summary of the proposed regulations can be found here.
Alternatives for Physicians
Physician practices are dealing with increased demands from the government, from managed care companies, from employers, and from patients to provide higher quality and better access to health care at cheaper costs. While these demands existed before health law reform, health law reform has exacerbated the pressures and the uncertainties on physicians and their advisors. Most of the alternatives for responding to these demands have been around for some time, but the need for more decisive action has greatly intensified. Some of the intensity is artificial, fueled by the fear of being left behind. In some cases, it is too early to do anything, because so much is still in flux. Newspapers, magazines, professional websites, and blogs are reporting on these issues more and more. This is likely to add to the confusion of what to do and when to do it.
Nevertheless, neither opportunities nor threats can be ignored. Physicians and their advisors must be alert and be prepared to act when the time is appropriate. Premature action may be as hurtful as delay. Staying informed is critical.
Here is a list of practice alternatives that I am seeing, and my physician clients are experiencing (and, in some cases, adopting). The list is not meant to be exhaustive, and I would like to hear what any of you or your clients are experiencing in this time of professional, economic, and legal uncertainty.
- Internal improvement of practice management — e.g., better billing and collection procedures, adoption of EHRs, employing more skilled administrative support staff
- Expansion of healthcare services being offered — e.g., adding nontraditional healthcare services, employing specialists
- Engaging outside practice management companies
- Consolidation/merger of solo and small practices with larger, same specialty practice groups
- Consolidation/merger/affiliation with multi-specialty practice groups
- Affiliation with IPAs, PHOs, and now ACOs
- Sale of practice to national practice management, single specialty, and multi-specialty corporations
- Sale to, affiliation with, or employment by hospital organizations
- Opting out of Medicare and managed care plans and establishing a concierge practice for selected patients
Over the next several postings, I will review these alternatives and discuss the issues involved.
AMA/American Medical News Article — Medical office embezzlement risk heightens at beginning of year
In an article this morning, amednews.com warns that, because patients are paying more of their medical expenses and most deductibles and co-pay obligations reset on the first of the year, the risk of employee embezzlement increases with the significant amount of cash passing through the hands of medical office staffers.
The article cites an MGMA November 2010 survey which found that “[n]early 83% of 688 practice managers were affiliated at some point with medical offices where employee theft occurred, … Nearly 45% of practice managers reported cash stolen before or after it was recorded on the books.”
I personally have had to counsel physician clients who discovered that a trusted, long-time office manager or other staff person had embezzled from the practice — a little here, a little there over many years until the total amount stolen added up to a substantial sum. There is seldom much of a chance of recovery from the embezzler. The current economic pressures will likely exacerbate this risk.
Types of activities that may occur:
- Cash payments not being recorded or reconciled accurately
- Voiding or refunding charges to vendors or patients improperly or to the wrong person
- Theft of prescription pads and drugs for sale to others
Criminal background checks may not help, because the new employee may never have stolen before.
Good internal controls are critical. Every practice should consult with its accountants, business insurers, lawyers, and other advisors to review its internal policies and procedures to insure that appropriate safeguards are in place.
Typical Physician Employment Agreement Negotiating Points (from the physician’s point of view)
The Employment Agreement sets forth the employer’s and the individual physician’s understanding of the terms and conditions of their business relationship.
Pre-Contract Discussions — Often the prospective physician employee and the employer will have a number of informal discussions before a contract is drafted. Please understand that agreements reached during those early discussions will not be binding on anyone unless included in the actual contract that is ultimately signed.
Letter of Intent — Before circulating the actual contract, the employer may send out a “letter of intent” to make sure that there is agreement on the basic terms of employment. There is little advantage to the prospective physician employee in signing such a document. If you must, please review it carefully, make sure that it is not binding, and look for any restrictions on your talking to other prospective employers.
Contract — Read and understand the document that your prospective employer has put in front of you. It is a legal document and will be binding on you after it is signed. The employer’s lawyer has drafted it, and he is not your friend. Get help.
Before You Sign — It is important for the parties to perform business and legal due diligence on each other.
• Business Due Diligence: Contractual arrangements with physicians are based on both the personality and professionalism of the parties. Business due diligence will help reassure the parties that there is a reasonable personal and financial basis for the parties to enter into a contract. Business due diligence includes review and research into the following issues: What is the professional background of the parties — what is the professional and business reputation of each party? What kinds and how many malpractice actions have been filed? What managed care plans are in effect? What do the financial statements look like? Who are the parties’ accountants? Bankers? What has been the experience of each party in similar contractual arrangements?
• Legal Due Diligence: There are voluminous regulatory issues affecting physicians, groups, hospitals, MCO’s, and others. Because of this increased scrutiny, legal due diligence will help reassure the parties that everyone takes these issues seriously. Legal due diligence includes review and research into the following issues: Has there been any exclusion of any party from participating in the Medicare program or from any managed care plan? Does the party have a compliance plan — if so, what does it say? Is a third party billing company used — if so, does it have a compliance plan? Who are the parties’ lawyers and consultants?
Hot Topics to be on the Look Out For —
• Hospital Recruitment: Is this arrangement part of a hospital recruitment program? Many hospitals help physician groups recruit new physicians by providing loans to the group and/or physician which may be forgiven over time subject to the physician’s maintaining privileges at the hospital and working in the area for a specified time period.
• Exclusive Contracts: Does the group that you are joining have an exclusive contract with one or more hospitals? If so, if and when the exclusive contract terminates (or your employment agreement terminates), you may be required to resign from your privileges at the hospital(s).
Provisions in (or that should be in) Every Employment Agreement
1. What Type of Business/Legal Relationship — The individual physician can be contracted with either as an employee or independent contractor. As an employee, the group will have control over the way the employee discharges his or her duties, when time off is taken, shifts to be worked, etc. The employer will pay withholding, social security, and Medicare taxes on the employee’s wages. If full time, the employee will participate in the group’s retirement and other fringe benefit programs. Independent contractors, on the other hand, are “independent” in how they perform their duties for the group contracting with them. There is no withholding or employment taxes paid with respect to their compensation, and they are not entitled to participate in retirement and fringe benefit programs. The correct classification of a physician as either an employee or an independent contractor is very important. If a group engages a physician and treats him as an independent contractor, but the IRS later decides that the physician was actually an employee, the group will be responsible for paying back employment taxes, contributions to retirement plans, plus interest and penalties. Because this can have a severe economic impact on a group, groups often include in their independent contractor agreements an obligation for the physician to indemnify the group for all such unpaid taxes, contributions, interest, and penalties in the event a reclassification occurs. The physician should be very sensitive about signing such a provision.
2. Term and How to Terminate/For Cause vs. Not For Cause — The parties should understand precisely the term of the arrangement that they are entering into. If the agreement is renewable, it is important to specify whether or not the agreement terminates or renews automatically and the prior notice, if any, that is required. If the agreement can be terminated without cause at any time, it is important to realize that the actual term of the agreement is really only the length of the notice period for termination. For example, a two-year employment agreement that can be terminated by either party with 60 days prior written notice, is really only a 60-day contract. If the agreement can be terminated with cause, the specific types of cause that are sufficient for termination should be listed, as well as the conditions under which the defaulting party can cure the situation.
— Termination How/When By Employer
— Termination How/When By Employee
You should also be prepared to address salary and benefit continuation and calculation after termination.
Beware of penalties and paybacks as a result of early termination [e.g., moving expenses, sign-on bonus, EHR incentives and licensing fees].
3. Compensation — Non-owner physicians are compensated in a variety of ways. Often, especially during the first year or two of employment, there can be a base pay plus a discretionary incentive bonus. Alternatively, compensation can be based solely on a percentage of actual collections for services rendered. Depending on the circumstances, there may be a shift from one form of compensation to the other or a hybrid of both. The agreement should set forth the specific formula or methodology for determining the physician’s compensation (which may include how expenses are allocated among the different physician employees).
— Salary
— Guaranty
— Productivity-Based
— Periodic Increases
— Bonuses
4. Fringe Benefits and Perks — Fringe benefits should also be listed with specificity: health insurance for the physician, dependent coverage, if any, CME reimbursement, books and journals, retirement benefits, life and disability insurance, cell phone and beeper, moving expenses, office and facilities. If these benefits are critical to the employee, he or she may want to include a provision in the agreement prohibiting any changes to them without the employee’s consent.
— Health Insurance [family coverage included?]
— Disability Insurance
— Life Insurance
— Pension/Profit-Sharing/401K
— CME Allowance
— Books and Journals
— Car/Mileage Allowance
— Malpractice Insurance/”Tail” and “Nose” coverage
— Vacation/Time Off/Sick Leave
5. Duties and Extent of Service — The agreement should specify whether it is full time, part time, or temporary. Often, a physician will want to use his or her time off to do other fee-generating services. Employers, on the other hand, often feel this is inappropriate. Also, if a physician desires to perform charitable or other professional activities that are not income-producing (e.g., speaking, writing, serving on the boards of civic organizations), that should also be addressed in the agreement.
— Detailed Description and Practice Location
— Full-Time/”Moonlighting”?
— Expert Witness Fees
— Teaching/Writing/Speaking
— Expand/Develop New Practice Areas
— Investments and Outside Activities
6. Day/Night Calls and Weekend Calls and Vacation Coverage — The call schedule can sometimes be a point of major contention. The method by which call is shared needs to be clear in the agreement. The time off policy should also be clearly understood by the parties. The time off allowance may include vacation time, time for CME, sick leave, and the like.
— How Determined?
— How Shared?
— How Compensated?
7. Restrictive Covenants — Restrictive covenants include promises not to compete, not to solicit patients or employees or referral sources, and to keep group and patient information confidential. While this may vary from state to state, the physician and the group (whether an employment or independent contractor relationship) should assume that restrictive covenants are enforceable.
In Florida, Section 542.335, Florida Statutes, governs the enforceability of covenants not to compete. By its express terms, Section 542.335 requires, at least, that covenants not to compete be subject to:
(a) Reasonable time limitations — more than two year period is presumed unreasonable in employment arrangements.
(b) Reasonable geographical area limitations — limitation as to specific facilities where an employer provides medical services was found to be reasonable.
(c) Reasonable business interest — employer must prove that the restriction is reasonably necessary to protect a legitimate business interest, which includes:
i. Valuable confidential business information;
ii. Substantial relationships with existing or prospective patient, customers or clients; and
iii. Patient, customer or client good-will associated with an ongoing practice, a specific geographic location or area, or specialized training.
For the group, these covenants are a way to protect its investment in the training and development of the physician. For the individual physician, the covenants can be an onerous burden that may require the physician to leave the community in which he or she has been living and working.
The typical remedy for violating the covenants is an injunction which, if granted, will prohibit the departing physician from further violations. Sometimes, “liquidated” or specified monetary damages will be provided. Sometimes, the group will accept the alternative of a cash payment from the departing physician to “buy out” the restrictive covenants, thereby freeing the departing to solicit patients, compete, etc. These payments though can be very high — in the five to six figure range.
Although most group practices require their new physician employees to sign contracts containing restrictive covenants, the provisions should be carefully read and understood by both parties and negotiated to the extent possible, especially the provisions relating to the time period for the restrictions (usually six months to two years, and sometimes longer) and the geographic area of the restriction (sometimes a county where the employee physician has been working or a specific mile radius from the office(s) location(s)). Make sure you understand the following:
— What is Restricted
— Type of Practice
— Patient Solicitation
— Employee Solicitation
— Hospital Privileges
— Referral Sources
— Time Period
— Geographic Area
— Remedies [Cash vs. Injunction]
8. Employer-Controlled Matters — There are a number of issues in the operation of the medical practice that are determined solely by the employer/owners.
— Fees, Billings, Collections, Records [EHR]
— Patient Admission
— Managed Care Plan Particiapation and Medicare and Medicaid
— Group Involvement in Other Business Ventures [e.g., IPA’s, PHO’s, PPM’s, MSO’s]
— Hiring and Firing of Staff Employees
— General Policies and Procedures, Complaince Plan
9. Becoming an Owner in the Group — If applicable, the time period and possible terms for a physician employee to become an owner of his employer/group practice should be described in the agreement. It is often difficult, however, to address these issues with much particularity at the start of the business relationship.
10. Indemnity Provision — This provision is often included in agreements. It provides that the employee is financially responsible to the employer for damages or losses experienced by the employer for the employee’s breach of terms of the agreement. These can be problematic, because the employee could be responsible personally to the employer for any malpractice damages not covered by insurance, repayments to third party payors because of an inadvertent billing/coding mistake, etc. These should be avoided, or at least be mutual.
11. Attorneys’ Fee Provision — One should be included in the Agreement providing that the winning party has its/her/his legal fees paid by the other side.
12. Change of Law — Because of the rapidly changing healthcare law regulatory environment, it is not uncommon for agreements to include a provision that allows the agreement to be changed or terminated if one or more provisions (usually dealing with compensation) become problematic as a result of new laws or regulations or new agency or judicial interpretations.