Archive

Archive for March, 2014

Health care providers embrace the challenge to do better

March 29, 2014 Leave a comment

Iowa is a leader in providing high-quality, low-cost health care.

— This is what is supposed to happen under Obamacare.

Let’s all admit one thing — the serious talk of improving quality of healthcare, increasing access to care, and reducing the cost of care began in earnest as a result of Obamacare.

See on www.press-citizen.com

Obamacare Faces Major Struggles

March 29, 2014 Leave a comment

Public support for President Barack Obama’s health care law is languishing at its lowest level since passage of the landmark legislation four years ago, according to a new poll.

At some point the liars win and progress stops.  Has there ever been a bigger campaign of deceit and misinformation than what the ACA has had to endure?

See on www.huffingtonpost.com

Tampa pill mill pharmacist tells court his attorneys didn’t get it right

March 29, 2014 Leave a comment

TAMPA — Disgraced pharmacist Christopher Switlyk shows no love for the attorneys who defended him over his key role in a Tampa pill mill ring.

When you break the law and can’t get off after turning others into addicts, I suppose it’s a good time to blame the lawyers.

See on www.tampabay.com

Categories: Fraud and Abuse, Pharmacy

The Next Big Health App Needs to Do More Than Just Track Our Numbers | Gadget Lab | Wired.com

March 22, 2014 Leave a comment

This week we got a deep look at the rumored new health and fitness tracking application for Apple’s next iPhone, called Healthbook. Supposedly, Healthbook will not only track things like how much exercise and sleep you’re getting, but also your blood pressure, your blood sugar levels, and much more. All that collection will be great, but without a way to not just collate them, but make them meaningful, it runs the risk of becoming data clutter.

Parochial restrictions on telemedicine will become irrelevant when smartphone apps effectively aggregate healthcare data to help individuals become and stay healthier. It is only a matter of time when face to face interaction between healthcare providers and their patients become the exception rather than the rule.  Physicians will be able to devote their time to sicker patients while still monitoring their healthier patients to keep them healthy.

See on www.wired.com

Doctors on Twitter: 2006 – 2014 Worldwide growth mapped #hcsm

March 22, 2014 Leave a comment

[Video maps growth in doctors, nurses and healthcare professionals using Twitter since its launch in 2006 to 2014.]

While Facebook lends itself better as a professional social media portal, it would be interesting to know the growth in patients’ following their physicians on Twitter (and other social media).  If we can get past the hurdles of HIPAA restrictions and other legal silliness, social media could become the mechanism through which patients and their physicians effectively interact and improve their healthcare.

See on www.youtube.com

Steps 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 in Doing a Healthcare Deal (Correctly)

March 12, 2014 Leave a comment

Steps 2

Step 3 – Identify the governmental agencies that have authority over the deal

  • Are there any notices or approvals required?
  • What are the licensing requirements?
  • Will a change in control occur?
  • Is a new provider application/number needed?
  • Is a CON needed?  An inspection?
  • What effects will the deal have on any accreditation needed by the parties?
  • What is the timing of agency requirements vs. closing the deal?

Step 4 – Identify the third party payors that will be involved

  • Are the services to be performed as a result of the deal reimbursed by Medicare?
  • Medicaid?
  • Other federal or state programs?
  • Commercial payors?
  • What credentialing/provider applications are needed?
  • Do any payors have special requirements that must be satisfied before closing the deal?

Step 5 – Identify the due diligence requirements

Remember that a healthcare deal starts like any other deal, and the parties must do their basic due diligence about each other

  • Entity organization and ownership
  • Legal authority
  • Financial statements, assets and liabilities, liens
  • Contracts and commitments, leases
  • Employees and benefit plans
  • Taxes
  • Insurance
  • Litigation

Step 6 – Identify the healthcare due diligence requirements

What other items items of due diligence are required by the applicable healthcare laws and regulations?
  • Licenses and requirements applying to transaction
  • Equipment and inventories
  • Cost reports, inspections, regulatory correspondence
  • Quality of care, malpractice claims/insurance
  • Patients records, EHR compatibility, billing software
  • Managed care/provider agreements, liability, assignability
  • Subcontractors/suppliers
  • Stae law requirements
  • Fair market value
  • Commercial reasonablenessFair market value and Commercial Reasonableness — These are the critical underpinnings of every healthcare deal.  What is being given, what is being received, and is it commercially reasonable?Get an opinion from a qualified healthcare valuation expert to support the FMV.

Step 7 – Document the Deal

  • Documentation is a critical step in protecting the parties, achieving the goals of the deal, and meeting compliance requirements.  Stark Exceptions and Anti-Kickback Safe Harbors impose specific requirements on deal documentation.
  • Should the parties enter into a nonbinding letter of intent/memorandum of understanding?
  • Pros – helps the parties determine whether there has been a meeting of the minds prior to devoting substantial time and expense and helps manage expectations and reduce surprises.
  • Cons – can consume an inordinate amount of time prior to due diligence being completed and lock the parties into unrealistic positions.

Paper StackNext time — How to screw up the deal that everyone wants.

Justice Department Hits Physician Owned Distributorships (PODS)

March 12, 2014 2 comments

Florida Healthcare Law Firm Blog

money doctor For the first time, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has fired a shot at a physician owned distributorship (POD).  In the case, the DOJ suit claims that the ownership interest of a neurosurgeon in a spinal surgery device distributorship has caused him to perform unnecessary surgeries.

PODs have been the source of considerable controversy for years.  A couple years ago, they caught the attention of Congress.  The Office of Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services (“OIG”) has even issued a Fraud Alert making clear their dislike of PODs and sending a clear shot across the bow of those who are in that industry.  In 2006, the Office of the Inspector General of HHS and CMS expressed major concerns about PODs, and cited concerns about “improper inducements.”  At that time, the OIG stopped short of prohibiting them, but called for heightened scrutiny.  CMS itself has stated…

View original post 1,086 more words

%d bloggers like this: