Industry Recognition of Akerman’s Lawyers and Practices

July 20, 2011 Leave a comment

Chambers USA, The Legal 500, and several other publications have again ranked Akerman as a leading law firm in numerous practice areas, including healthcare.

Chambers USA has ranked 14 of the firm’s practices in Florida. On a national scale, The Legal 500 has ranked Akerman as one of the best firms in the United States for Corporate M&A, Real Estate, Land Use, Construction, and Immigration.

A record number of Akerman lawyers were also recognized this year with Chambers listing 48 Akerman lawyers; Super Lawyers listing 76 in Florida; Florida Trend Legal Elite listing 35; and The Legal 500 listing 19.

This is in addition to numerous local publications that continue to recognize the caliber of the Akerman team. 

The recognition of Akerman and its many exceptional lawyers is a direct reflection of our commitment to our clients. 

Here are the links to the various publications: 

Chambers USA

The Legal 500

Super Lawyers Florida

Florida Trend Legal Elite

Complete list of firm recognition

 

Categories: Akerman

ACOs are not for Sissies

July 14, 2011 Leave a comment

This is the title of a presentation I gave to the Tampa Bay MGMA on July 12.

Many have touted ACOs as one of the most critical reforms in the Affordable Care Actbecause of its focus on realigning healthcare provider financial incentives to patient-centered and preventive care and away from procedure/volume based care.  I agree with that assessment.  Unfortunately,  the proposed regulations (which have been justifiably bashed by many in the healthcare industry) have done much to derail ACOs.

The final regulations will hopefully incorporate many of the criticisms so that the movement toward ACOs can continue.  According to two industry leaders, ACOs must be successful: 

 “The Accountable Care Organization: Whatever Its Growing Pains, The Concept Is Too Vitally Important To Fail” — Health Affairs, 30, no. 7 (2011):1250-1255

“The accountable care organization model is intended as an option both for Medicare and for non-Medicare, commercial health care services. However, the general model and the specific shared savings model proposed for Medicare have come under criticism. Much of the criticism is valid and should be addressed.  However, none should serve to prevent the evolution of this model, because the alternative to a fundamental restructuring of how health care is delivered and paid for in the United States is likely to be a type of indiscriminate cost cutting that will leave the nation with a damaged health care system, reduced access to care services, and declining quality of care.”
 

“ACOs and Medicare … quo vadis?” — MGMA Connexion, July 2011
 
“[T]he  accountable care organization (ACO) concept — with its emphasis on improved care coordination and payment based on measurable value rather than volume — holds great promise for ensuring that our healthcare system is safer and offers higher quality and more cost-effective care while increasing patient satisfaction.”
 
“One hopes that the new Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation will be a bit more adventurous (and a bit less prescriptive) in creating experiments and demonstration projects that stand a real chance of making the potential of ACOs a reality. If not, our healthcare system may be subjected to even more draconian intervention in the quest to control Medicare costs.”
 

So, what should healthcare leaders be doing now?
 
Until the final ACO regulations come out, there are limits to what can be done intelligently.   Doing nothing is one alternative, but it may not be the best alternative.  The ACO field is full of consultants, and each of them has his or her own plan on how to proceed.  All of their plans focus on what is needed to create and sustain a successful ACO (assuming that the final regulations don’t get in the way). 

 
If a group is interested in establishing or being part of an ACO, I believe it is worthwhile for them to engage an advisor who is experienced in health care — both from an administrative and from a clinical point of view — to help them assess their readiness for accountable care. 
 
One consulting group, Harpeth Consulting, has listed a set of “strategic competencies” that it views as critical for a sustainable ACO:
 
•Leadership
•Organization culture of teamwork
•Relationships with other providers
•IT infrastructure for patient population management and care coordination
•Infrastructure for monitoring, managing, and reporting on quality factors 
•Ability to manager financial risk
•Organizational structure to receive and distribute payments or savings bonuses
•Resources for patient education and support
•Ability to aggressively disseminate best practices  
•Ability to manage financial risk
•Organizational structure to receive and distribute payments or savings bonuses
•Resources for patient education and support
•Ability to aggressively disseminate best practices
 
Part of the assessment of a group’s readiness for accountable care will be to see how they measure up in each of these areas.
 
For over 20 years, there have been many failed models of health care integration – PPMs, IPAs, PHOs, Hospital employment and acquisition of physicians, etc.
 
ACOs represent the next wave of integration and care coordination.
 
Groups with foresight and guts (i.e., not sissies) can take the leap and get in front of the ACO learning/planning curves.
 
 
 

HIT, Small Physician Practices, and IPAs

July 2, 2011 Leave a comment

In its June 2011 Research Brief, the National Institute for Health Care Reform reports that “lessons from independent practice associations (IPAs) — net-works of small medical practices — can offer guidance about overcoming barriers to HIT adoption and use” in small physician practices.  The study found that IPAs, as local networks of independent physician practices, promoted the development of HIT-knowledgeable physician leaders who were able to gain the trust of their less HIT experienced colleagues in coordinating efforts to deal with risk-based managed care contracts.

The study concludes that “IPA experiences with HIT adoption can offer insights for other entities charged with helping physicians in small practices overcome barriers to HIT adoption and use.”

(The study may also provide critical insights to, and hope in, dealing effectively with the even greater hurdles that physician groups are facing in their coming together to form accountable care organizations, where HIT will be critical to success.)

Compliance Oversight for Healthcare Leaders and Compliance Plans

June 29, 2011 Leave a comment

In a new seven minute video presentation, OIG Inspector General Daniel Levinson and Chief Counsel Lewis Morris discuss the role of compliance and its importance to the health care industry.

By now, I think we all know that compliance with healthcare laws and regulations is good, and that noncompliance can be very bad.  There is nothing much to learn in seven minutes.  However, there is an important reminder in the video that the OIG wants providers to have effective compliance plans in place. 

Nursing homes are required by the healthcare reform law to have such plans, and  the law gives the OIG the power to require other healthcare industry groups to have compliance plans.  

It is only a matter of time before this requirement is imposed on physicians.     The OIG published guidance for physician compliance plans over 10 years ago.  That guidance is worth reading again.  Similar compliance guidance can be found at the OIG website for other kinds of healthcare providers. 

This is something that healthcare providers should not put off any longer.

CMS Issues Stark Advisory Opinion 2011-01

June 28, 2011 Leave a comment

In CMS Advisory Opinion AO-2011-01, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services issued an advisory opinion permitting a group to include a covenant not to compete in its employment agreement with a physician whose recruitment to the group was funded by a local hospital. 

In its advisory opinion, CMS stated that the the physician recruitment exception to the Stark law “requires that the physician practice not impose additional practice restrictions on the recruited physician other than the conditions related to quality of care.”  However, CMS acknowledged that, in its commentary to the Phase III Stark rulemaking, it had concluded “that non-competition provisions should not be categorically prohibited from recruitment arrangements.”

In determining that this particular noncompetition covenant did not impose practice restrictions that “unreasonably restrict the [p]hysician’s ability to practice medicine in the geographic area served by the [h]ospital,” CMS looked at the following factors:

  • The time period restriction of one year was reasonable.
  • The distance requirement of 25 miles was reasonable based on the geographic area served by the hospital.
  • Even with the time period and distance restrictions, the physician would still be permitted to practice at certain hospitals both within and outside of the recruiting hospital’s geographic service area within the one year time period.
  • The hospital had certified that the noncompetition covenat complied with applicable state and local laws. 

As with all such advisory opinions, it is issued only to the requesting party and cannot be relied upon by any other individual or entity.

Nevertheless, this advisory opinion provides guidance for the first time on how CMS will analyze the language of the statute, the regualtions, and its own commentary in specific physician recruitment fact situations.

Medicare Fraud — Physical Therapy Clinic Employees

June 24, 2011 Leave a comment

The Department of Justice announced yesterday another Medicare fraud scheme.  This announcement dealt with employees of the Solstice Wellness Center in the Brooklyn-area.  

The employees pleaded guilty to paying kickbacks to Medicare beneficiaries to induce them to visit Solstice where they were to receive physicians’ services, physical therapy, and diagnostic tests that were neither actually performed nor medically necessary.   Solstice billed Medicare over $3.4 million.

Categories: Fraud and Abuse

CMS Podcasts for 2011 ICD-10 Implementation

June 22, 2011 Leave a comment

On January 12, 2011, CMS held a national provider call on “Preparing for ICD-10 Implementation in 2011.” From the audio of that event, CMS has created the following four podcasts:  

  • Welcome and ICD-10 Overview – Pat Brooks, CMS 
  • Implementation Strategies for 2011 – Sue Bowman, AHIMA 
  • Question and Answer Session, part 1 
  • Question and Answer Session, part 2 

These podcasts are now available here in the downloads section.

 

Categories: CMS Updates

NEW TECHNOLOGY TO HELP FIGHT MEDICARE FRAUD

June 21, 2011 Leave a comment

Predictive modeling once was used to help pick stocks on the rise and now is going to be used to identify Medicare cheats. 

CMS announced in a press release on June 17, 2011 that it will be using new technology to track down healthcare fraud.  CMS states in its press release that this technology is similar to tools used by credit card companies.  This is part of the White House’s continuing campaign to cut waste in the Medicare program.

You can learn more about this technology at this CMS Factsheet.

Better Care and the Bottom Line

June 20, 2011 Leave a comment

According to a survey of health leaders published in a HealthLeaders Media Intelligence Report, “Better Care and the Bottom Line” (June 2011), best practices for chronic care and evidence-based medicine are needed to overcome drivers of waste such as overutilized services and a lack of integration.

  • 52% of the survey respondents put overutilization of services in their top 3 drivers of waste in the healthcare system
  • 67% say a realistic goal for readmission rates is 1% to 3%, but only 40% have achieved that goal
  • The top three tools cited to address medical cost escalation are chronic care management, evidence-based medicine, and medical liability reform.

Healthcare providers are being presented with numerous avenues for achieving better quality and more cost effective medical care — ACOs, consolidation of practices, and affiliation with hospitals, to name just a few.  

If you would like to get a copy of the Report, click here.

Whistleblowers Have Rights, Too

June 15, 2011 Leave a comment

I just picked up this story from Outpatient Surgery

Apparently, a sheriff in Winkler County, Texas decided to punish two nurses who complained about his physician friend. The nurses had filed an anonymous complaint about a variety of questionable practices by the physician.   When the shreiff discovered who had filed the complaint, he charged the nurses with “misuse of medical information.”

The sheriff now faces jail time and a $6,000 fine.